[darcs-users] data loss? or advice?

[Eric Kow]

Hi Isaac,

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 14:12:52 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> But I feel like the revert interface could still be safer somehow.  Like  
> asking you whether you want to revert the file contents first, and only  
> if you do, allowing you to revert the addfile... although I'm not sure  
> that's the most sensible tweak

That's odd.  According to http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1422, Trent was
making the exact opposite observation about the order of darcs revert.

Did it accidentally get switched around somewhere?  It's perfectly safe
either way, but I think I'd be happier with a darcs revert that felt
more like the other undo commands.

Could you check the file removal example too?

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090823/6f6bae98/attachment.pgp>