[darcs-users] Darcs 2.4 - performance testing volunteers needed
dagit at codersbase.com
Wed Dec 23 02:01:27 UTC 2009
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Nathan Gray <kolibrie at graystudios.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:12:06PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
>> So could I get a benchmarking volunteer for each of these platforms?
>> It would be extremely helpful if you could respond by the end of this
>> week :-)
>> - MacOS X
>> - Linux
>> - Windows
> I can benchmark on Linux (debian on i686).
> I would also like to see darcs1 in the comparison. We have not
> upgraded yet because we have large repos. It would be nice to
> know if darcs 2.4 is fast enough compared to darcs1 for us to
> consider upgrading.
Which is more important to helping you make the decision:
1) darcs 1.x binary vs. darcs 2.4 binary on a darcs-1 formatted repo; OR
2) darcs 2.4 binary comparing darcs-1 format speed to darcs-2 format speed?
I suspect that #2 will be included but #1 is more work for
benchmarkers (only because darcs 1.x is pre-cabal and thus harder to
build for many people). It valuable to know up front which you are
expecting so we can plan for it in the benchmark.
More information about the darcs-users