[darcs-users] new dependencies

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Thu Dec 24 10:12:22 UTC 2009

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:06:47 +0000, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
>> Pushing patches may be a good time to do it, but then that doesn't
>> allow much time for discussion, so I guess it's really up to the
>> reviewer (in this case me, sorry) to make sure it's OK and post an
>> announcement.
> FWIW I think the policy should be that it's up to the patch author to do  
> this, and the reviewer to check that the patch author hasn't forgotten  
> anything. [This isn't a criticism of anyone, just a thought about what we 
> should aim for in future.]

Good. I've updated


I feel a little silly because this seems like too much of a corner case
to be stuffing our policies documentation, but I guess overdocumentation
is a lesser evil than underdocumentation.

Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20091224/6a9bcb0f/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list