[darcs-users] Google Summer of Code 2009 - ideas, students and mentors?
gwern0 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 12 16:57:48 UTC 2009
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Kari Hoijarvi <hoijarvi at seas.wustl.edu> wrote:
> Eric Kow wrote:
>> * A Windows project: not sure what this would entail, but darcs on Windows
>> might need a bit of special attention
>> o 2008-08 : proposed as a priority for darcs 2.2 * A single-file
>> database pristine cache, which should be faster and more robust
>> than our directory-based approach. e.g. a halfs filesystem.
>> o 2008: darcs 2.0.0 has hashed pristine, which is more robust, but
>> it's not single-file. do we still want this?
> For TortoiseDarcs, fast and complete querying of repository status would be
> very welcome.
> Currently I run "darcs show files" and "darcs whatsnew -s
> [--look-for-adds]". It works, but has annoying lag. When you add a file, it
> still shows as not-in-darcs for a while. Continuous parsing of
> '_darcs/patches/pending' as TortoiseDarcs 1 did it is fragile, and not the
> way to go.
> I'd like to have these two commands as a single report, with more
> information: timestamp, file size, type[dir/file], if the file is in
> I'd like to get this also for a single file and for all the files in a
> single directory, not recursive.
> Preferably this should be a library call, starting processes is expensive.
>> * Keeping track of which patches affect which files, to speed up query
>> operations that affect only certain files (e.g. changes, diff, etc, when
>> a filename argument).
>> o 2008-06 status: I don't think we do this yet. Still open?
> Good and fast diff between two versions of a single file would be very
> welcome. It's the last feature I still miss from TortoiseCVS,
Is that very hard? filestore has that functionality, after all. IIRC,
it was basically 'darcs changes --from-match="hash foo"
--to-match="hash foo" file'.
More information about the darcs-users