[darcs-users] forensics case study (isolating an 'Irrefutable pattern failed' error)
Christian Kellermann
Christian.Kellermann at nefkom.net
Fri Feb 20 11:27:23 UTC 2009
* Eric Kow <kowey at darcs.net> [090219 18:28]:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:23:10 +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> > > http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1363 ?
> >
> > Looks very much like it. The structure of my hunks is definitely
> > similar. Alas, if I could remember how this situation came into
> > existance in the first place!
>
> Hmm!
>
> So it seems that the appropriate next action would be to take Thorkil's
> proposed simplification and to turn it into a test case such that one
> order of patches causes a conflict, whereas the other causes them to be
> applied cleanly.
>
> If we have such a script then we'll have a really lovely specimen for
> our bugs directory.
So how should we proceed with the original bug? I can go on not
using the patch bundle but to use the common + pulled repo as the
initial state for minimalising the history?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090220/65e4e5c9/attachment.pgp>
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list