[darcs-users] annoyance with darcs convert . (darcs convert dot, aka the current directory)

Thomas Hartman thomashartman1 at googlemail.com
Thu Feb 26 18:54:18 UTC 2009

To be honest, I just never got in the habit of using darcs put, ever.

I don't see why it's advantageous to use put rather than push.

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Eric Kow <kowey at darcs.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:23:16 -0800, Thomas Hartman wrote:
> > > What repository are you trying to push to?
> >
> > Not to worry, it's a freshly createdempty patch-tag repository expressly
> for
> > the purpose of central control after converting to darcs-2, which I think
> is
> > Right.
> Phew, that sounds safe indeed!
> And I think (like Zooko), the reason you must be trying to do that is
> because of that pesky darcs put bug (which does not pass the right flags
> to the remote repository, and is known to our issue tracker).  It's
> likely an easy bug to fix if anybody wants to tackle it, especially as
> an introduction to the darcs code (in preparation for the upcoming
> sprint, woo!)
> Thanks,
> --
> Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmm4IUACgkQBUrOwgisBPmT1ACg6eyppw3Leozh7WWWdkVhYEny
> xJsAn1jcWA+2Ai6bKHwjRhmktvq1rojo
> =VZxV

Thomas Hartman

Need somewhere to host your code? patch-tag.com
Want to build a webapp? happstack.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090226/f2cef4a6/attachment.htm>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list