[darcs-users] darcs patch: make unit's return value depend on all tests

[Eric Kow]

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:41:48 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Equally likely, they'd say "use Mercurial queues/Stacked Git/quilt".
> IMO, that's the real competition for Darcs (in terms of patch theory;
> for simply tracking history of a branch, Darcs's user interface is
> still ahead of the competition, but git is catching up fast).

Indeed Jakub Narebski (a git user and bit of a developer) says that
really darcs should be compared with something like topgit and not
git itself: http://repo.or.cz/w/topgit.git

(he also thinks that hey, maybe the notion of patch commutation
would be useful for something like topgit)

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090106/862f12a0/attachment.pgp