[darcs-users] can we remove --no-pristine-tree?
Kari Hoijarvi
hoijarvi at seas.wustl.edu
Thu Jan 8 14:50:41 UTC 2009
>> - on the other hand, for hashed repositories --no-working-directory
>> would be less transparent than a hypothetical --no-pristine-tree,
>> because of our internal gobbledegooky filenames... we would have
>> to do something like darcs show contents and darcs show files to
>> retrieve files, yuck :-(
>>
>
> This isn't an issue specific to working-treeless repos. Any tool that
> wants to know what *Darcs* thinks is in the repo should be using the
> show commands, not just catting whatever happens to be in the working
> directory. Cf. the arguments for/against the --hashed format.
>
This is what my upgrade to TortoiseDarcs 2 does. The current
functionality of "show files" and "whatsnew -s --look-for-adds" is
sufficient, but in the release I'll write down my wish list.
Kari
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list