[darcs-users] Fwd: Towards a conflict-free revision control system.

Trent W. Buck trentbuck at gmail.com
Mon Jan 19 23:45:36 UTC 2009


Dan Pascu <dan at ag-projects.com> writes:

> On Friday 16 January 2009, Kari Hoijarvi wrote:
>> For example whitespace formatting patches would simply go away.
>
> Are you suggesting here to deliberately ignore explicit indentation 
> changes made by the user?

No, that they would be a different kind of patch to textual changes --
just as presently, there are different kinds of patches for file moves,
adds, removals, setting of preferences, and patches to binary files.



More information about the darcs-users mailing list