[darcs-users] Fwd: Towards a conflict-free revision control system.

Dan Pascu dan at ag-projects.com
Tue Jan 20 15:11:50 UTC 2009


On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Dan Pascu <dan at ag-projects.com> writes:
> > On Friday 16 January 2009, Kari Hoijarvi wrote:
> >> For example whitespace formatting patches would simply go away.
> >
> > Are you suggesting here to deliberately ignore explicit indentation
> > changes made by the user?
>
> No, that they would be a different kind of patch to textual changes --
> just as presently, there are different kinds of patches for file moves,
> adds, removals, setting of preferences, and patches to binary files.

Thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Dan


More information about the darcs-users mailing list