[darcs-users] Naming consistency between darcs and other DVCSs
Dan Pascu
dan at ag-projects.com
Thu Jul 16 04:52:52 UTC 2009
On 16 Jul 2009, at 05:14, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
>
>> "rollback" has a precise meaning in database theory. It means to
>> undo the last transaction (possibly incomplete) in the history. IMO
>> Mercurial uses this correctly, Darcs does not.
>
> Erm, in Darcs 2 rollback records a new inverse patch. That is, it's
> something like
>
> darcs diff -p foo | patch -p1 -R
> darcs record -m 'rollback foo'
>
> I would have thought that a rolled-back transaction (in database
> terms)
> is closer to obliterate, since the end result is that you have no
> record
Actually is the equivalent of unrecord. In a database you rollback an
unfinished/unsuccessful operation.
> of that transcation, rather than X + -X = 0. Admittedly, IANADBA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-users mailing list
> darcs-users at darcs.net
> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
--
Dan
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list