[darcs-users] Naming consistency between darcs and other DVCSs

[Ashley Moran]

On 16 Jul 2009, at 07:02, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

>> Erm, in Darcs 2 rollback records a new inverse patch.
>
> Right, and that is incorrect usage (if you want to conform to database
> terminology).  The reason for using "undo" in the phrase above is that
> the transaction may be incomplete, and therefore it's not yet part of
> history so that "delete" doesn't make sense.


How about `darcs reverse`?  Not sure I like it... just a suggestion.

Ashley

-- 
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
http://aviewfromafar.net/
http://twitter.com/ashleymoran