[darcs-users] Naming consistency between darcs and other DVCSs
ashley.moran at patchspace.co.uk
Thu Jul 16 12:33:20 UTC 2009
On 16 Jul 2009, at 07:02, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Erm, in Darcs 2 rollback records a new inverse patch.
> Right, and that is incorrect usage (if you want to conform to database
> terminology). The reason for using "undo" in the phrase above is that
> the transaction may be incomplete, and therefore it's not yet part of
> history so that "delete" doesn't make sense.
How about `darcs reverse`? Not sure I like it... just a suggestion.
More information about the darcs-users