[darcs-users] darcs patch: Mention Emacs' table support in a comment. (and 1 more)

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Thu Jul 16 14:44:28 UTC 2009

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 07:38:51 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Is it worth the effort?  I would say, only if it helps us advance the
> state of art with darcs *or* is super simple to setup.  Therefore, my
> vote is on #1.  I'm not claiming that #1 is trivial by any means, but
> the manual does sketch how to do it for a regular user:
> http://darcs.net/manual/node5.html#SECTION00540000000000000000

I think a cursory inspection would be a good idea because darcs patches
have a much wider reach than what the web inteface allows wiki.

That and I'm not volunteering either.

Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090716/9be4bb2b/attachment.pgp>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list