[darcs-users] Naming consistency between darcs and other DVCSs

[Dan Pascu]

On 16 Jul 2009, at 15:33, Ashley Moran wrote:

>
> On 16 Jul 2009, at 07:02, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
>>> Erm, in Darcs 2 rollback records a new inverse patch.
>>
>> Right, and that is incorrect usage (if you want to conform to  
>> database
>> terminology).  The reason for using "undo" in the phrase above is  
>> that
>> the transaction may be incomplete, and therefore it's not yet part of
>> history so that "delete" doesn't make sense.
>
>
> How about `darcs reverse`?  Not sure I like it... just a suggestion.


I think it's way to similar to revert and would be _very_ confusing.

--
Dan