[darcs-users] Naming consistency between darcs and other DVCSs
dan at ag-projects.com
Fri Jul 17 11:14:30 UTC 2009
On 16 Jul 2009, at 15:33, Ashley Moran wrote:
> On 16 Jul 2009, at 07:02, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>> Erm, in Darcs 2 rollback records a new inverse patch.
>> Right, and that is incorrect usage (if you want to conform to
>> terminology). The reason for using "undo" in the phrase above is
>> the transaction may be incomplete, and therefore it's not yet part of
>> history so that "delete" doesn't make sense.
> How about `darcs reverse`? Not sure I like it... just a suggestion.
I think it's way to similar to revert and would be _very_ confusing.
More information about the darcs-users