[darcs-users] Naming consistency between darcs and other DVCSs

Dan Pascu dan at ag-projects.com
Fri Jul 17 11:14:30 UTC 2009

On 16 Jul 2009, at 15:33, Ashley Moran wrote:

> On 16 Jul 2009, at 07:02, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>> Erm, in Darcs 2 rollback records a new inverse patch.
>> Right, and that is incorrect usage (if you want to conform to  
>> database
>> terminology).  The reason for using "undo" in the phrase above is  
>> that
>> the transaction may be incomplete, and therefore it's not yet part of
>> history so that "delete" doesn't make sense.
> How about `darcs reverse`?  Not sure I like it... just a suggestion.

I think it's way to similar to revert and would be _very_ confusing.


More information about the darcs-users mailing list