[darcs-users] Question about xml --summary output
jhgranarolo at hotmail.fr
Mon Jul 20 20:16:17 UTC 2009
> It'd be better to implement this in darcs (i.e. add the required --match
> option). See http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1499Thanks, I look forward to this feature !
> Yes, the fact that darcs rearranges the hunks, at least in presence of
> --xml, always surprised me! In particular, it always shows "moves"
> before anything else.
As I see things, something like this :
move A B
implies that A was first added then moved to B, resulting in a repository containing only B.
But this :
move A B
should, at least for me, always mean that A was moved to B,
then another file named A was added, resulting in a repository containing A and B.
But as I said in the previous mail, it happens that before reordering it was (add, move).
Even if I am still not sure under what circumstances this happened,
this is the case on the repository I did my tests, so this is a situation where reordering made things ambiguous.
So what is the reason behind the moves reordering ?
Vous voulez savoir ce que vous pouvez faire avec le nouveau Windows Live ? Lancez-vous !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the darcs-users