[darcs-users] Question about xml --summary output

[Lele Gaifax]

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:16:17 +0200
jh granarolo <jhgranarolo at hotmail.fr> wrote:

> As I see things, something like this :
> 
> addfile A
> move A B
> 
> implies that A was first added then moved to B, resulting in a
> repository containing only B.
> 
> But this : 
> 
> move A B
> addfile A
> 
> should, at least for me, always mean that A was moved to B, 
> then another file named A was added, resulting in a repository
> containing A and B.

Yes, and only way to interpret it right is by consulting the
"context", that is, the situation before the patch ("if there was a
file A to move, then it's the latter case, otherwise..."). Surely not
ideal.

ciao, lele.
-- 
nickname: Lele Gaifax    | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas    | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
lele at nautilus.homeip.net |                 -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.