[darcs-users] post-hoc move

Jason Dagit dagit at codersbase.com
Thu Jul 30 14:26:22 UTC 2009

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Max Battcher <me at worldmaker.net> wrote:

> Hamish Allan wrote:
>> Surely a post-hoc move must be an extremely common operation? What am I
>> missing?
> Doing the darcs move after a physical mv generally "just works".
> Also, if you think darcs is "out of sync" with what you think the current
> working directory state is regarding adds/removes/moves, you may try
> deleting _darcs/patches/pending. (This is the file where darcs stores
> adds/moves until they are recorded.)

I don't have a machine handy to test, but I think darcs revert also works on
pending?  Meaning that you don't have to go into the "special" directories
to fix it.  Well, I could be wrong as I haven't tested this in a while.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090730/8d753d1e/attachment.htm>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list