[darcs-users] _real_ cygwin build?

Trent W. Buck trentbuck at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 00:10:55 UTC 2009

zooko <zooko at zooko.com> writes:
>>> Apparently such a version would require a _real_ cygwin ghc?
> That would be ideal.

Call me Mr. Silly, but why is a Cygwin version of Darcs preferable to a
native binary?  Last time I looked at Windows (which was, admittedly,
about six years ago) cygwin was a bloated, messy pile of confusing and
unweildy junk -- and that if you could get a utility (e.g. bash or grep)
as a stand-alone .exe, it was *much* easier to deploy.

More information about the darcs-users mailing list