[darcs-users] do we still need libwww support?
dmitry.kurochkin at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 22:39:08 UTC 2009
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Petr Rockai <me at mornfall.net> wrote:
>> The motivation behind libwww support is less clear. I suspect it may
>> have been something to do with pipelining (which I understand libcurl
> Pipelining, plus it's impossible to make proper static binaries with libcurl,
> but it's doable with libwww, without resorting to (slow) haskell HTTP library.
Why is it impossible to make static binaries with libcurl? IIRC I was
able to make one under both linux and windows.
More information about the darcs-users