[darcs-users] _real_ cygwin build?
me at mornfall.net
Fri Mar 6 08:13:42 UTC 2009
trentbuck at gmail.com (Trent W. Buck) writes:
> This repo is in the legacy hashed format. I recommend you do a test
> conversion to darcs-2 format and see if that improves matters.
Hashed and darcs-2 formats are identical, performance-wise. The only difference
is patch format. However, this repo is *not* in hashed format, so it could
benefit (or suffer) from hashed/darcs-2 conversion.
> Note that checkpoints are not useful for repositories in darcs-2 format.
And neither are they in (legacy) hashed format. Moreover, they are only useful
for --partial checkouts, which break in other ways. I'd suggest not using them
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com
http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net
"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
-- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation
More information about the darcs-users