[darcs-users] darcs patch: Partially resolve issue1376: merge darcsman.hs into da...

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Mon Mar 9 10:44:32 UTC 2009


On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 21:27:40 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> > Thanks Trent, here's some quick review. Background:
> > http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1376 says

> > I'm sympathetic to building things right into the darcs binary when it
> > eases building, deployment, and is not unuseful for users. Eg I'd like
> > to build in some form of test runner. Your change indeed looks simple
> > and should do what you want. I'm in favour of things that work for now
> > even if not perfect.
> >
> > I'm uncomfortable with "darcs help manual" though because it's
> > strictly to make cabal packaging easier

Applied, thanks!

Thanks too to Simon for the review (and attention to principles).
I guess "darcs help manual" couldn't hurt.  I hope we're not setting
some sort of crazy precedent.

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090309/a0592c39/attachment.pgp>


More information about the darcs-users mailing list