[darcs-users] Do you really mean resolved here?
Trent W. Buck
trentbuck at gmail.com
Fri Mar 13 15:02:11 UTC 2009
Thorkil Naur <naur at post11.tele.dk> writes:
>> status: wont-fix -> resolved
> Now, I don't really care, but it seems useful to be consistent about the
> status usage. I also considered changing to resolved, but my thinking was
> that, since the issue is really pointing at a potential problem in the
> manual, changing the status to resolved would seem to imply that we had
> actually changed the manual accordingly, somehow.
Maybe if the "resolved" status were renamed to "done", people would be
less likely to misapply it?
 per the semantics described on the wiki. (Sorry, I'm too lazy to
find the precise page.)
More information about the darcs-users