[darcs-users] Darcs for GHC

Petr Rockai me at mornfall.net
Tue May 19 12:57:20 UTC 2009


Tommy Pettersson <ptp at lysator.liu.se> writes:

> I'm in favor of amend-record on steroids, but just want to point
> out (maybe the obvious) that it is not a general solution for
> the long-lived branch problem. It works if the "branch" is a
> single repo, but it doesn't scale with the dynamic behavior of
> darcs, i.e., a group of people working on separate copies of a
> "branch".

Good point. It's the same problem that rebase has, though -- the branch has to
be private (or alternatively, means outside of VCS need to be used to
synchronise participants).

Yours,
   Petr.

-- 
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com
 http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net

"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
 indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
     -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation


More information about the darcs-users mailing list