[darcs-users] [issue1671] Patch bundle failed hash! -- tell me the expected hash

Trent W. Buck twb at cybersource.com.au
Tue Nov 3 04:04:20 UTC 2009


Eric Kow <kowey at darcs.net> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:24:20 +0000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> You're right -- patch37 wouldn't apply due to a hash mismatch, and
>> just deleting the hash made darcs go ahead and apply it.
>
> Ah, but careful!  There's a good reason for the hash mismatch.
>
> For some reason, when I save in mutt the attachments that go through the
> bug tracker, the context is messed up.  Fancy characters get translated
> to question marks (and if you hexdump, you see they really are question
> marks)...

FWIW, it wasn't the context part that was dodgy, because I extracted
that to foo.context and successfully did a get --context foo.context
(which I needed to do to remove the five newer patches that introduced
multiple conflicts, which I didn't feel like solving).



More information about the darcs-users mailing list