[darcs-users] darcs patch: added regression test for issue1632

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Fri Oct 2 12:36:29 UTC 2009

On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:03:55 +0200, benjamin.franksen at bessy.de wrote:
> Re-sending amended patch. However, I did not wrap 'darcs changes...'
> with a 'not', as explained in another message in this thread
> (<ha4gg6$ad8$1 at ger.gmane.org>).

Looks good to me.  Applied thanks!

added regression test for issue1632
Btw, I would have named that
  Accept issue1632: 'darcs changes d/f' should not list any changes.

I don't expect everybody to keep all these conventions in mind; they're
just little touches which help.

Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20091002/eed35b86/attachment.pgp>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list