[darcs-users] darcs patch: added regression test for issue1632

Benjamin Franksen benjamin.franksen at bessy.de
Fri Oct 2 13:51:51 UTC 2009

On Friday 02 October 2009, Eric Kow wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:03:55 +0200, benjamin.franksen at bessy.de wrote:
> > Re-sending amended patch. However, I did not wrap 'darcs changes...'
> > with a 'not', as explained in another message in this thread
> > (<ha4gg6$ad8$1 at ger.gmane.org>).
> Looks good to me.  Applied thanks!
> added regression test for issue1632
> -----------------------------------
> Btw, I would have named that
>   Accept issue1632: 'darcs changes d/f' should not list any changes.
> I don't expect everybody to keep all these conventions in mind; they're
> just little touches which help.

Does a comment "accept issueNNNN" trigger some status change in bug report 
NNNN? Are conventions like this documented somewhere?


More information about the darcs-users mailing list