[darcs-users] darcs patch: Resolve issue1588:make--dont-allow-conflicts filter ...
ganesh.sittampalam at credit-suisse.com
Mon Oct 5 13:42:41 UTC 2009
Eric Kow wrote:
> It sounds like we have really three cascading choices here:
> With the each later one in the sequence being effectively meaningless
> if you select 'dont' for the one before it.
That's a nice way of looking at it, thanks!
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:
More information about the darcs-users