[darcs-users] darcs patch: missing LANGUAGE in Darcs.Commands.Unrevert (and 2 more)
Trent W. Buck
trentbuck at gmail.com
Tue Sep 1 12:35:04 UTC 2009
Jason Dagit <dagit at codersbase.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ganesh Sittampalam<ganesh at earth.li> wrote:
>> These three patches between them fix the witnesses build on GHC 6.8.2, thus
>> resolving issue 1562. I'd have mentioned this in the patch message but I'm
>> not really sure which patch to put it in given that they are all relevant
>> (and I used different patches to get better commutation behaviour).
>> The underlying issue is that the normal build specifies a whole bunch of
>> extensions in darcs.cabal, but the witnesses build doesn't. So a lot of
>> files rely on those extensions without specifying them explicitly in
>> LANGUAGE pragmas. Ideally we would specify everything in LANGUAGE pragmas,
>> but that might be significant effort for the really commonly used ones.
>> On a side note, now that we're at GHC 6.8 as a minimum, can't we remove the
>> OPTIONS_GHC pragmas?
> I'm okay with that. It will make it increasingly difficult for anyone
> who randomly is forced to build on ghc6.6 though. To me that is the
> only consideration and it's not worth the effort because we can tell
> them to use -fglasgow-exts.
AIUI we officially don't support GHC 6.6 anymore.
>> Sat Aug 29 07:12:08 BST 2009 Ganesh Sittampalam <ganesh at earth.li>
>> * missing LANGUAGE in Darcs.Commands.Unrevert
>> Sat Aug 29 07:12:56 BST 2009 Ganesh Sittampalam <ganesh at earth.li>
>> * missing LANGUAGE in Darcs.ProgressPatches
>> Sat Aug 29 07:19:22 BST 2009 Ganesh Sittampalam <ganesh at earth.li>
>> * specify CPP globally for witnesses build
> These look great to me. I just can't push anything, yet. Trent could
> you push these please? It's my name on the review if they break
> something :)
More information about the darcs-users