[darcs-users] darcs patch: Make the running of tests more entertaining

[Trent W. Buck]

naur at post11.tele.dk writes:

> I amended and re-sent. And just curious now: In a case like this,
> would it be better to re-edit and create a completely new patch,
> throwing away the original? And if this was done, should the new patch
> get a different name or could the name of the earlier patch be
> re-used?

As a reviewer, I don't care if an amendment also renamed the patch, so
long as --in-reply-to is used.  Without it, such an amendment won't be
threaded correctly by my newsreader.