[darcs-users] darcs patch: Make the running of tests more entertaining
kowey at darcs.net
Sat Sep 12 19:59:26 UTC 2009
My main answer would be that it's not really a big deal.
It's all just clear and efficient communication that we're after,
right? Do what works. (If it turns out that I'm wrong about this
and that there is a reason that this matters, we should update our
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:38:49 +0200, naur at post11.tele.dk wrote:
> I amended and re-sent. And just curious now: In a case like this,
> would it be better to re-edit and create a completely new patch,
> throwing away the original?
As opposed to amending? I don't see it would make a difference
(except for the slight bit of technical wobble in the diffs that
Ganesh pointed out, but in most cases, non-issue)
> And if this was done, should the new patch get a different name or
> could the name of the earlier patch be re-used?
No particular need for it to get a new name even if you did that. Just
let us know what happened and we can sleuth our way through should
anything go wrong.
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the darcs-users