[darcs-users] darcs patch: resolve issue1406: amend-record unrecords on a test fa...

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Sun Sep 13 07:51:14 UTC 2009

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 14:43:17 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Not sure how you guys missed it, but once that bundle came to the list I
> replied here:
> http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2009-September/021175.html

My mistake.  I asked mutt to limit my box to messages with 1406 in their
subject line but neglected to unlimit the view having found my thread.

> I need you guys to comment on: 1) The orphan patches that I bring up in that
> reply. 2) Putting inverse patches in tentative_pristine versus commuting
> patches to the end and discarding them.

Thanks.  I appreciate you pointing us to the very latest state of
affairs, but I think the real problem underlying my summary request is
that I no longer have a top-to-bottom view of the situation.

Perhaps this discussion in sprawling out enough that we could maybe
consider using the review-on-wiki approach pioneered by Ganesh and Petr
and made practical by our use of darcsit.  For reviews where it is easy
to get lost, this technique could help.


Sorry for the hassle, but could I ask you guys (Jason and Kamil) to
darcs get --lazy http://wiki.darcs.net and plug some stuff into the
template?  I've made a very meager start on it.  Copy and pasting from
mails is fair game.

Kamil: I promise that we're not normally this bureaucratic! It's
just that you stumbled upon something a lot trickier than any of
us where expecting :-)

Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090913/574edec2/attachment.pgp>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list