[darcs-users] Handling relative directories

Ganesh Sittampalam ganesh at earth.li
Tue Apr 6 19:07:12 UTC 2010

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Petr Rockai wrote:

> It *might* actually be a reasonable compromise to only provide threading
> on sensible systems (i.e. those that have openat/f*at...).

What about Windows?

In any case, hidden behind a suitable library, we can just use absolute 
paths to support threading without much cost, so I don't think there is 
any need for such a compromise, unless we really want to minimise the 
number of possible configurations.


More information about the darcs-users mailing list