[darcs-users] Historical Versions (was: GSoC: network optimisation vs cache vs library?)
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Apr 15 07:23:36 UTC 2010
Max Battcher writes:
> I personally don't see a need for [better history keeping, multiple
> branches]. I think there are more interesting tools that solve
> similar problems that could be improved first: better/stronger
> interactive file annotation/blame tools; better/stronger darcs
> trackdown; tools that maybe we don't even have names for today.
All of which depend on data structures that are basically equivalent
to a history DAG, ISTM. If so, perhaps it would be better to figure
out what a DAGgy Darcs might look like first, rather than end up with
a DAG implementation per tool.
More information about the darcs-users