[darcs-users] support for old-fashioned repos (Was: Optimize darcs diff)

[Nathan Gray]

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:55:02PM +0200, me at mornfall.net wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:14:28PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> 
> >  - Large _darcs/pristine.hashed due to insufficient bucketing?
> 
> On this, we are probably stuck due to backwards compatibility within hashed.
> I'll see what can be done. Once again, we first need to clean up the code to
> know better.

I think part of why I have not been able to migrate off of
old-fashioned repositories is because of this.  For me, there is
no backwards compatibility issue because I hope to completely
skip the first version of hashed (unless by some miracle it is
made fast enough without this change).

-kolibrie

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20100820/933e7ac0/attachment.pgp>