[darcs-users] proposal for 2.8 : fastconvert (and remark on the process)
kowey at darcs.net
Fri Dec 3 09:52:28 UTC 2010
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:20:48 +0100, Florent Becker wrote:
> As long as we decide to maintain darcs-fastconvert and to advertise it
> officially, I don't see what advantages there are to having
> darcs-fastconvert included in darcs rather than separate.
There seems to be a consensus that darcs-fastconvert should at least
officially be a darcs product: it's what Ganesh suggested when Petr
first wrote it as a darcs patch, and what I heartily +1ed. We may have
failed to actually act on this intention (it happens), but I think it
was always there.
> We certainly should have darcs-convert binaries for the platforms which
> have darcs binaries now. We have to have it packaged in debian, and so on.
Florian and Alexey, is this something you'd would be able to massage
into your workflows.
> Grumpily, Senilely and Manly yours,
I could go either way myself, but as a matter of principle, if in doubt,
we should err on the side of grumpiness. The problem with feature creep
is that all of the features that creep in do so because they are good
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or
xmpp:kowey at jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the darcs-users