[darcs-users] proposal for 2.8 : fastconvert (and remark on the process)
ganesh at earth.li
Sat Dec 4 01:30:18 UTC 2010
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Florent Becker wrote:
> If we include it, I'm strongly against using the convert subcommand for
> import-export, since it already has delicate semantics which would only
> be made even more byzantine: darcs convert works in place, while
> darcs-fastconvert deals with import/export streams, darcs convert needs
> to be done once centrally, a constraint we may or may not have with
We ought to aim to relax these restrictions somewhat and make darcs
convert more user friendly. I don't think it's actually necessary to do
the convert once centrally, so long as each patch is only converted once.
Ultimately I think I'd like to see both darcs convert and
darcs-fastconvert behave as bridges.
More information about the darcs-users