[darcs-users] On Release Management
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Dec 4 11:29:28 UTC 2010
Eric Kow writes:
> I think four things have changed since Petr introduced release
> branches.
>
> - core team maintains HEAD, not one person (not sure if this came
> before or after, but it may be a factor to consider)
> - more relaxed push rules (trivial or peripheral things need not
> be reviewed)
> - core team pushes directly to release branch, with policy about
> what to push
> http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2010-June/024284.html
> - better infrastructure/automation for doing releases (thank you
> Petr and Reinier?)
>
> Maybe these things make the conditions for release on HEAD a bit
> better?
I think all of those things are minuses for QA, except maybe
infrastructure (if P & R are particularly anal-compulsive about adding
QA features to release infrastructure, it could be a plus, but
automation per se tends to make it easier to overlook regressions),
and therefore make conditions for a HEAD release *worse*, not better.
IMHO YMMV YouWontKnowUntilYouTry, etc.
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list