[darcs-users] hashed repos qualitatively for GHC
kowey at darcs.net
Sat Jan 9 18:41:15 UTC 2010
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 13:47:32 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I've just built the latest darcs so that I could use
> --skip-conflicts (it's great!).
Go Ganesh! :-)
> I'm doing all my work in hashed repos locally, and my perception of
> the performance is that it's "different" to darcs-1 format repos.
Is it usable? Would you be willing for GHC to switch over to hashed
everywhere, replacing --partial with --lazy for the buildbots? It may
be good to apply the latest version of patch72
and see if it makes a difference.
> Some things are very fast: whatsnew, pull/push --dry-run. Other
> things seem to crunch my disk a lot and take a lot longer than I
> would expect. For example, I just pushed a few patches from one GHC
> repo to another and it went like this:
I've submitted the above as http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1729
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the darcs-users