[darcs-users] performance regression in check/repair
dagit at codersbase.com
Sat Jan 16 17:41:09 UTC 2010
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Eric Kow <kowey at darcs.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 00:32:07 -0800, Jason Dagit wrote:
> > I hope we're not glossing over anything here. Is there a bug report for
> > check failure in the beta yet? It looks like 2.2 and 2.3 were able to
> > that repo, so why should we ship 2.4 if it fails to check it?
> I'll bet that the check failure is just a consequence of the performance
> regression noted in <http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1731>, but if anybody
> wants to offer evidence to the contrary, please do file a report.
I compiled from the 2.4 branch last night and left the check running to find
The repository is consistent!
I want to stress that I upgraded hashed-storage from hackage and updated
darcs-2.4 from the release branch before doing this. So I should have
Petr's latest fix for hashes of empty directories right?
Are these hash mismatches ignorable warnings or real problems?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the darcs-users