[darcs-users] Feedback on hunk splitting with Darcs 2.4 beta 1

Eric Kow kowey at darcs.net
Mon Jan 18 20:58:56 UTC 2010

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 20:40:09 +0000, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> If you are trying to split a hunk, it's because there's a bit you
> want and a bit you don't want. Because they touch each other, the
> newly split hunks will have a dependency between them, and the order
> of that dependency is determined by the order in which they are
> created, i.e. you have to keep the bit you want in the text you
> edit. I think this was the confusing thing that Mark described where
> he wasn't allowed to select the bit he actually wanted.

Oh yes, somehow I managed to fool myself into thinking that not seeing
the filler patch (the other part of the split) was a problem.

Of course it's not a problem because you can only record one patch at
a time anyway, so you're going to have to choose one or other.

Enthusiasm restored!

Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20100118/25f88496/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the darcs-users mailing list