[darcs-users] Should the hunk editor edit files, or in-memory patches? (was: Re: [patch123] Name the separators in the hunk split...)
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Jan 21 07:22:11 UTC 2010
Mark Stosberg writes:
> It was said that a goal with the current implementation was to be
> consist with the fact that "record" never modifies the working
> So I ask the rest of the user list, would you expect that "edit" during
> darcs record would trigger editting a piece of a file, or would you
> expect it to edit one more patches in memory?
I would expect an edit operation to allow me to commute primitive
patches, perhaps defined somewhat differently than current Darcs
(since hunk splitting actually changes a patch that is currently
termed "primitive" IIRC).
More information about the darcs-users