[darcs-users] witnesses and 2.5
Eric Kow
kowey at darcs.net
Sat Jul 17 18:22:09 UTC 2010
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 19:01:25 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> In March, there were three or four people using the darcs library, a
> veritable explosion :-). With at least two of them, questions about
> things like filtering lists arose. Things have gone a bit more quiet
> again since then, but I do feel that nipping any dangerous usage in
> the bud is a good thing.
>
> >Just seeing if this code making it to stable is itself urgent
> >or if by urgency we're mostly just talking about Darcs hackers.
>
> In my view, there is some urgency in it getting into stable for the
> library. For the executable, changing HEAD is fine.
In that case (and despite it being a way off before we'll get any
maintenance benefits), I guess I would somewhat uncharacteristically say
"punch it" (let's flip that switch as soon as you feel we can reasonably
do it)
(I might even go so far as to say that we should go ahead and flip
both switches at the same time if that makes life any simpler)
Of course, that's just me... :-)
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20100717/8661b6ca/attachment.pgp>
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list