[darcs-users] a bug with "darcs changes --reverse --index" ?
Benedikt Schmidt
beschmi at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 21:17:13 UTC 2010
Hi Mark,
Mark Stosberg wrote:
>
> I was just using "darcs changes" with 2.4 and wanted to narrow down a
> list of 20 patches.
>
> I started with this:
>
> darcs changes --reverse -i -p 7072
>
> I saw the patches I wanted to focus on were 9 through 20, so I did this:
>
> darcs changes --reverse -i -p 7072 -n 9-20
>
> I expected to see 11 patches returned but the result was..2.
>
> It appears that I get the same 2 patches when I exclude "--reverse".
>
> So perhaps there is a bug when combining these flags. When --reverse
> is used, shouldn't "--index" start counting from the other end?
are the indices you use consistent with the ones shown by --number? I
just noticed that the numbering does not change with --reverse; the
newest patch is always numbered 1.
Best,
Benedikt
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list