[darcs-users] a bug with "darcs changes --reverse --index" ?

[Mark Stosberg]

> are the indices you use consistent with the ones shown by --number? I 
> just noticed that the numbering does not change with --reverse; the 
> newest patch is always numbered 1.

Benedikt,

I was not aware that I needed to use the output of number. This looks
like a doc-bug then.

In "darcs changes help", it current says this about --index:

  select a range of patches

I believe it should say:

  select a range of patches base on --number values

  Mark