[darcs-users] GHC 6.8?
Eric Kow
kowey at darcs.net
Wed Mar 17 13:14:21 UTC 2010
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:01:59 +0200, Yitzchak Gale wrote:
> But darcs is version control - people's data is at stake.
> We need not only the ability to reconstruct our data
> with some time-consuming process; we need the ability
> for our data to be actively and conveniently accessible
> on all platforms that are in active use.
So, if I could shape that into a sort of question: under what
circumstances would Debian stable users need to *compile* (as
opposed to fetching a binary) *new* versions of Darcs?
For the new bit, I think it would be if we were ever to release
a version of Darcs that fixed some crucial bug (say a pending
patch issue).
For the compile bit, could we get away with some sort of
backport that people could install?
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20100317/8f6ba42e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list