[darcs-users] on-disk formats of patches

[Eric Kow]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 14:47:43 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> Although in theory ComP could be nested, I've never seen this
> happen.

General plan seems sensible.

I might be more comfortable with a stronger statement than "I've never
seen this happen" :-), something along the lines of "in the source code,
Darcs only ever uses the ComP constructor with non-ComP prims", or
"darcs treats ComP [ComP foo bar] exactly as it might ComP [foo bar]" 

In any case, quite reassuring to see that at the very least, we now
knom more about the on disk patch format.

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or
xmpp:kowey at jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20101017/a9bab12f/attachment.pgp>