[darcs-users] proposal: license darcs wiki as CC-BY 3.0
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Tue Sep 14 13:24:48 UTC 2010
Eric Kow writes:
> So maybe we have some hope of just outright relicensing it if we
> can contact everybody and get them to OK the switch?
FWIW, I believe Wikipedia unilaterally relicensed at some point. Also
there was some discussion of this issue at the OSI, and there was a
draft white paper by Eric Raymond (who is not a lawyer) on some legal
theories that might let you get away with it.
> * simple
> * permissive
> * widely known/recognised/understood (no need to think about it)
> * written by real lawyers
I would say this reduces your options to three: The revised BSD
license, the Academic Free License (by Larry Rosen -- explain it as
the MIT/X11 license on steroids), and one of the Creative Commons
The CC licenses are probably the best known of those for this purpose.
More information about the darcs-users