[darcs-users] 'submitted' branch

Florent Becker florent.becker at ens-lyon.org
Tue Sep 14 19:11:48 UTC 2010

> OK, that's fine and I agree with the sort of overall drive for a more
> general way of doing things.  But I'm taking this to mean you have no
> objections to the submitted branch as a way of working in principle.
Yes, I'm ready to try it as an experiment. Even if we end up reverting
to record against HEAD, having a 'submitted' branch is useful
information (as it makes it easier to see if you conflict against
something likely to end in HEAD before your own work gets reviewed).


More information about the darcs-users mailing list