[darcs-users] [patch402] include old text in conflict marks

Ganesh Sittampalam ganesh at earth.li
Wed Sep 22 21:58:55 UTC 2010

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Eric Kow wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:48:22 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
>> I don't have any specific experience of (2), I could test it out if
>> you think it's important.
> I don't think this should block patch application, but it could be
> useful to have conflict-generation and marking scripts, not necessarily
> for automated regression testing (which is tricky because we're not
> so much worried about "correct" output as "desirable" output and the
> latter is harder to pin down because we don't necessarily know what the
> right thing to want is).  But such a thing could be useful for Eyeball
> Testing.

Agreed. Probably makes sense to make regression tests with clear labels 
that it's ok to update them if you really are improving conflict marking - 
just to guard against inadvertent modification.


More information about the darcs-users mailing list