[darcs-users] what about removing the unrevert command?
jch at pps.jussieu.fr
Mon Apr 4 18:51:48 UTC 2011
> I'm interested about how revert/pull/unrevert is a good workflow with
> regards to git stash / pop.
I'm happy with either, although I find revert/unrevert easier on the
brain. (git reset --hard HEAD. Ugh.)
> So one question for you git users: How is the darcs revert / pull /
> unrevert workflow better than just pulling and resolving conflicts in
> the working copy?
That's not what I use it for. I'm hacking on a feature, and suddenly
I realise there's a bug for which there's a one-line fix:
-- fix bug
darcs record -a
Note that the darcs revert is necessary, since my tree might not even
compile when I notice the bug.
More information about the darcs-users